Thursday, October 04, 2007

Rahul is exception as he belong to the Nehru Family: Bhim Singh

News Agency of Kashmir 10/4/2007 5:45:26 PM

Jammu, Oct 04 (NAK): Chairman Jammu Kashmir National Panthers party Prof Bhim Sing today informed Mr. Rahul Gandhi that there was nothing fresh for any political activist to learn that he has been elevated as a general secretary of the Indian National Congress to look after the youth and the students’ affairs.

JKNPP Chairman in his letter addressed to Mr. Gandhi said that class needs a critical study about its characteristic and behavior in India in general and in each cultural region in particular. “I don’t know how much interaction you have shared with this class studying and working at different levels”, the letter said

The ambition and mission of a student studying in the public institutions cannot be compared with a student studying in a village school or in the slums. Syllabus may be same but aims and dreams are different, rather, vertically opposed. “I have gone through the students movement for nearly two decades and had tough experience with the working of the Youth Congress from 1973 to 1976, when Shri Sanjay Gandhi rose to the heights of glory” the letter said adding “I have also witnessed the era when Shri Rajiv Gandhi took the responsibility as a general secretary of the Congress Party and later as a president of the A.I.C.C.”.
Mr. Sing in his letter has mentioned that the family background is definitely important because it does help to project a person without work or contributions in a vast country like ours.

“You are definitely an exceptional class because you are the son of the Congress president and also belong to the Nehru Family”, letter reads
Mr. Singh in the letter, has placed, some important factors on record for book for information to the young leader which reads as under.

Any person who proposes himself for political arena must understand the genesis of the national problems our country has been confronting since 1947. All the national problems or issues have to be arranged in the personal book on priority basis. Which one deserves first attention and so on. Once national issues are identified priority wise, scientific and mathematically solutions have to be worked out. This is possible only if the leaders have working knowledge of the history, geography, cultural identity and political combinations and permutations of each region and state. The solutions are not a permanent feature. The strategy and the methodology to reach the solution do change with the changing of situation and need and the aspirations of the people. For this purpose one needs practical encounter with the situation.

The information sent to Mr. Gandhi states that Jammu and Kashmir is the first and foremost national problem. There lies a need to settle this issue forever to end uncertainty at home and unnecessary interference from abroad. The leaders who matter require both wisdom and vision combined with courage to seek a lasting resolution of the situation. Corrupt politicians in J&K should be kept out of power and party politics.
“The ghost of Pakistan shall die once outdated, corrupt and communal politicians are kept out of power” letter reads adding Compromises and concessions breed more corruption and more uncertainty. New generation has to be prepared, trained, educated and modeled in that fashion. A leader has to act as a model teacher or a loving doctor to cure the disease of corruption, violence and communalism.

There is a need to put all secular and democratic parties on a common platform with clear objective to defend the National flag, the constitution and the National boundaries.

All the three regions of Jammu and Kashmir need equitable and respectful treatment by the power that be, both in Delhi and Srinagar to ensure preservation, protection and promotion of linguistic, cultural, geographical and historical identities of all the regions of the state. There is an urgent need for the reorganization of the state of Jammu and Kashmir and the basis of the identities mentioned above so that the people of each region can develop their personality without interference.
Similarly, situation in the North-East is getting alarming. There is a breakdown of communication between the leadership and the people. Power hungry politicians have been blackmailing the Centre and browbeating the people. The people stand neglected and isolated. The growth of the youth cannot be identified with electoral prospects. It has to be identified with the national ethos. Let the youth understand the genesis of each problem national or local. You need study circles. Have you got any?
The print media has been disintegrated to benefit the press barons for electoral gains. Have you got an idea who is the real press Lord in the print and electronic media? What are their political and business connections? A so-called national paper is being printed from a dozen places. What is the reason? To raise revenue through advertisements from different publications from the same source may be the state or private enterprise. The information has been decentralized. This trend is causing a potential threat to the very concept of national integration. Paper published in Delhi provides no information of the important events taking place in other parts of the country. For the sake of raising revenues and earning benefits through advertisements each paper has opened its shop in every city thus killing the very purpose of the freedom of press. An event of Kanpur does not find a place in the newspapers of Lucknow. What’s happening in the North-East or in J&K does not re ach a common man residing outside the state. This system must end. The rules prescribed by the Press Council of India do not have any relevance. This is the job of the Ministry of Information. The Doordarshan has been made a robbery house for the so-called intellectuals and camera holders. How much money has been pumped in Jammu and Kashmir on the so-called ‘Kashir Channel’. What is the benefit and who is the beneficiary? There is no discussion or deliberations on these subjects. Political favours have to be brought to an end to save the autonomy of the institutions like Doordarshan, Radio and other channels.

The obsene demonstration of adds and advertisements in the print and electronic media is shocking and undesirable. It is causing assault on the very civilization and culture. Religious education combined with Model Code of Conduct cannot be shaken off the syllabus. Has any body ever tried to ponder about the cause of suicides, violence, obsinity among the youth? Lack of moral education. The old and outdated system of education needs a scientific change. Who shall do? The politicians are interested only in that electoral battles.

The architect of India’s foreign policy, Shri Jawahar Lal Nehru would have shed his tears today had he been alive to watch a vertical shift in India’s international behaviour particularly, vis-a-vis Arab countries and others. What happened to India’s commitment to the people of Palestine? Can India shine with Israeli watch-dog devices. Can India grow without active and affective cooperation of our Arab neighbours in the field of politics, culture and economy. India believed and recognised our friendship with Arab world till Mr. Rajiv Gandhi was in power. I remember Mr. Rajiv Gandhi collected my documentary films on Iraq and Palestine when he was leaving for Iran. He used to consult me on the latest development that was emerging in the Middle-East. That was a great quality of that leader to collect even pebbles from the deserted river, as I was.
What is the justification to demonstrate military exercise in Siachen and Kargil Sector with Anglo-American soldiers. What is the message, we want to send to China and others. The new generation cannot be misled by our election-oriented political jorgans.

India got freedom, this is what they say, 60 years back. What is the reason that we could not eradicate illiteracy in the country. 65 percent people in our country cannot read or write. Who is responsible? Congress remained in power for several decades and even today it is holding the rein of power in the centre and several states, why it failed to make people to read and write? Does it mean that Congress wants to keep the majority of the people ignorant so that they could be easily used as guinea pigs during the voting season? Have a look on the literacy campaign which was launched by Lenin after Bolshevik revolution in 1917. Each person even in Siberia could read and write by 1923 when Lenin died. Why India could not do that? You have to find out the answer to some of these questions.

India’s policy after Rajiv Gandhi underwent a dangerous turn rather tilt in favour of an undesirable domain controlled by the multinationals and the Anglo-American economic jurisprudence. Where is that industrial glory and pride of India which was so honestly and scientifically planned and launched by our first Prime Minister. You belong to Nehru family but do you also belong to the Nehru School of Thought? You would only provide the answer, if you so desire, some day.

No sycophants who claimed to be your admirers or members of your party shall dare tell you all that because their need is limited to seek fresh permits, quotas, election mandates and other favours. They dare not speak the truth because it needs both wisdom and courage. They are afraid of loosing your favour. I have seen a million audience around Mrs. Indira Gandhi and Mr. Sanjay Gandhi in 1975 and 1976, shouting slogans for their glory and victory. The same people defeated both of them in the Parliamentary elections in 1977. You need a deep study about the general behavior of the Indian masses. They are great and wonderful, even in spite of their poverty, rags and illiteracy they are the best judge at all the times. These video channels and radio mocks cannot disturb their school of thought which they have been religiously preserving for centuries. You may become Prime Minister of India some day because you would require a combination and permutations of only 273 MPs but to become a leader you have to identify yourself with the millions of the suffering people of this country. You cannot find them in the five star hotels, palaces and TV channels. They have to trace out from the banks of the Yamuna or the Ganges or on the slopes of the Himalayas. I suggest you spend half a day in front of any government hospital anywhere in the country, even in Delhi, you shall appreciate what I am trying to convey to you.
You will be looking after youth and students in the party. What plan or strategy you will like to adopt to eradicate drug addiction among the youth. Do you know that school children have started eating boot polish and such cheap drugs? Have you got any programme to start a battle against the drug evils growing in the society? We may use youth and students with our money and muscle power for sometime to rig polls which has become a culture with almost every political party, but will that satisfy you with your work. Needs a decision to fight all these battles with courage and wisdom.

What is the philosophy you will sell to the youth and students, who number in millions. They need job and work and live with honour and dignity. What is the instrument you would like to use to fight against injustice and discrimination by the power that be? If it were possible to deliver justice from the seat of power (as you are) to the suffering people, Buddha would not have renounced his thrown and walked into the forests.
First identify the cause of the people and then power. I hope and trust that you will not mind my echoes and my strokes Bhim while concluding his letter to Mr. Gandhi (NAK)

Rahul has a long way to go to revive Congress

New Delhi: Rahul Gandhi is taking his work as Congress general secretary seriously, but insiders and analysts warn he has daunting obstacles to overcome if his aim is to dramatically rejuvenate the party.

Congress sources say the Gandhi family charisma is a powerful factor, but they point out that the times are different and the party is now a pale shadow of its former self. And Rahul Gandhi does not have the advantages of his late father Rajiv and his late uncle Sanjay who sailed into Congress politics in the early 1980s and 1970s respectively when it was a powerful force in the country.

Political analyst Mahesh Rangarajan told IANS that the Congress decision last month to name Rahul Gandhi, 37, as a general secretary was aimed at grooming him ahead of the next general elections due in 2009 but which may take place earlier.

"The party's thinking is clear," he said. "They are preparing and grooming him for the leadership. That is why they have put him in charge of Youth Congress and NSUI (National Students Union of India). But this will be connected to the number of people from these groups they put up in elections.

"But we need to remember that the coming elections will be fought on the record of the Manmohan Singh government. Does he (Rahul) have the stomach for prolonged electoral politics? So far he has only had brief forays. Will he pass the acid test?"

Some in the Congress believe he will. Others are not so sure.

A first time MP, Rahul Gandhi, whose entry into Congress politics has slowly pushed his more popular younger sister Priyanka into the background, is already showing that he means business.

His first victory of sorts came last week when the Manmohan Singh government extended the National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme, which ensures work for the rural poor for at least 100 days a year, to all the 600-plus districts of India, from the present 300. The decision was announced just 48 hours after a Congress delegation that included Gandhi called on the prime minister.

Later, Rahul Gandhi took off for New York to be with his mother Sonia Gandhi, who addressed the UN General Assembly on the occasion of Mahatma Gandhi's birthday.

The Congress thinks Rahul Gandhi has age on his side, more so in a country where the overwhelming majority are under 35 years.

Some, however, see him as an introvert who relies more on computers and old buddies than on grassroots activists although he has a great desire to know and learn.

Rahul Gandhi failed to click in the May Uttar Pradesh ballot when the party's figure in the assembly slipped from 25 to 21 despite his extensive campaign. He attracted crowds but not votes for India's oldest political party.

"I am afraid it will take at least five years if not more for Rahul to fit into the system," said a Congress source. "He is essentially a computer boy."

There is another major handicap.

From a party that once enjoyed commanding influence, even after losing power nationally for the first time in 1977, the Congress is now limping. It won just 145 seats in the 545-member Lok Sabha in 2004.

Sanjay Gandhi became the Youth Congress head in 1974 and soon became a virtual right hand of his mother and prime minister Indira Gandhi - Rahul's grandmother - as she imposed Emergency, was then voted out and later stormed back to power.

Sanjay Gandhi was killed in an air crash in 1980. Rajiv Gandhi was made a party general secretary in 1983, one year before his mother's assassination propelled him to power. He led the Congress to a grand victory.

Today, in almost the whole of Uttar Pradesh, Bihar, Orissa, West Bengal and Tamil Nadu, accounting for nearly 225 Lok Sabha seats, the Congress is on a weak wicket or can win only with support from friendly parties.

"If in 40 per cent of Lok Sabha seats the Congress cannot achieve much, what can Rahul Gandhi do?" asked a Congress insider.

Worse, some of the small parties that helped the Congress to take the number one slot in the 2004 ballot have deserted it.

Analyst Rangarajan emphasised the point: "The Congress needs to rebuild itself after a very poor showing in Uttar Pradesh.

"When Sanjay Gandhi and Rajiv Gandhi got into party affairs, the Congress had majorities on its own. So it will be much tougher for Rahul Gandhi. The Congress is a pale shadow of its previous self.

"The Congress has usually come up with new ideas. What does Rahul have? If there is something, it is a closely guarded secret. What has emerged so far from Rahul is too little."

Family first, nation later

October 4th , 2007
Balbir K Punj

More by coincidence than design, the Congress, by making Mr Rahul Gandhi the general secretary of the party, has tried to capitalise on the increasingly recognised global success of India's youth power. But no one with a sense of history has missed the design in the pattern that the Nehru-Gandhi family follows. Rajiv Gandhi also was similarly crowned the 'prince in waiting' in 1981 and, within hours of Mrs Indira Gandhi's assassination, chosen by the party to lead the Government. Not one senior leader of the party dissented.

The pattern had already been set. The Congress had passed on from being Mahatma Gandhi's party to being the jagir of the Nehrus. And the freedom fighters or their heirs had reduced themselves to being sycophant courtiers.

Of course, Congressmen could point fingers at other parties - almost all of them except the cadre-based BJP and the Left parties - that have followed the same script: Mr Uddhav Thackeray instead of Mr Raj Thackeray in the Shiv Sena; Mr M Karunanidhi's son, Mr MK Stalin and not his nephew's son, Mr Dayanidhi Maran, in the DMK; one sees dynasties also in Mr Lalu Prasad Yadav's RJD and Mr Mulayam Singh Yadav's SP. In every case, blood is thicker than the glue of ideology that binds cadre and the party. This is a national shortcoming, a feudal heritage which some parties are unable to shake off.

Detractors of Right-wing politics have frowned at the phenomenon of 'son rise' in the BJP too. However, there is a basic difference in the way it has happened in this party. None of the sons have been or are being groomed for succession; if they are MPs, it is their right and the desire of the party leadership to induct fresh blood into the party to reinvigorate it. No one in the BJP has ever said that the sons would be the natural successors to the political position their parents hold today. And the progenies of the topmost leaders like Mr LK Advani and Mr Murli Manohar Joshi are not at all in politics. Even in the past, neither in the RSS nor in the BJP or Jana Sangh did 'son worship' ever creep in.

Inner-party criticism in the Congress stops at the doors of 10 Janpath. Whatever wrong decisions are taken, the "advisers" are made scapegoats. This mindset aids the supreme leader of the party to divert criticism, rotating the courtiers to fit the occasion. The monumental follies of Rajiv Gandhi, for instance, in reversing the Supreme Court's Shah Bano verdict, in sending the Army to Sri Lanka to fight the Tamil Tigers, in the attempt to cover up the Bofors scandal, etc, are never pointed out in that party.

The Congressmen, on the other hand, are not admonished for tarring the reputation of former Prime Minister PV Narasimha Rao. He is blamed for the 1996 ouster of the party from power. This criticism overlooks the fact that in 1991 Rao headed a minority Government and yet managed to last five years in power through adroit political manoeuvre.

What, in contrast, is the record of Rajiv Gandhi? From a position of having two-thirds majority in the Lok Sabha, the Treasury benches had the dubious record of running Parliament without the presence of any Opposition party, all of whom boycotted the House's proceedings a few months before the 1989 election. Thereon, the party had to bear the ignominy of the Bofors scandal for years to follow. Yet, the Congress is naming every corner of the country after Rajiv Gandhi. So much so, it did not allow the people of Hyderabad to name the new airport in the city after NT Rama Rao whose name was replaced with Rajiv Gandhi's at the last moment.

The Congress is not only choosing to live under the shadow of the Nehru-Gandhis, but is also going all out to obliterate any other name from the annals of history. Giants of the freedom struggle like Sardar Patel, Rajendra Prasad, BC Roy, Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose, Bal Gangadhar Tilak, etc, are confined to the corners. But every Government scheme, every airport, every national building, etc is named after the Nehru-Gandhis.

How worshipping this one family stunts national endeavour and consciousness is evident in every foundation stone laid and event celebrated in the name of national heroes. Take for instance the recent observation of the anniversary of Mahatma Gandhi by the UN this October 2. The Congress declares from rooftops that the Mahatma is the father of the nation. But the leadership that goes to UN to represent India on the occasion is simply a two-person delegation of mother and son.

The Prime Minister is supposed to be the leader of the country. His job on this historic occasion is to flag off a party rally, not be before the international gathering in New York. When national honour was being challenged in Geneva in 1993, Rao at least had the wisdom to send Opposition leader Atal Bihari Vajpayee to lead the Indian delegation to the Human Rights Commission where Mr Vajpayee fended off attacks from Pakistan and turned the tide.

The world recognised Gandhi as a great leader from India. But the Government has dishonoured him by making him appear a Congress mascot in order to burnish the image of its 'crown prince'. Congressmen have no voice in the party to protest the misuse of the national occasion as a family function. How can they protest, having acquiesced all along in turning over the Congress legacy to a fiefdom?

Communist countries like North Korea and Cuba are known to promote one family leaderships with vengeance; many authoritarian countries like Syria also do so. In Singapore, on the other hand, the grand old man Lee Kuan Yew, who built the modern city-state as an island of prosperity and egalitarianism, did not allow his son to succeed him smoothly. Lee's son first had to slog in the Army as an officer, was posted in the war zone of Vietnam, came back and joined politics, became Minister for 10 years before becoming Prime Minister through a democratic process.

The ruling party's culture of worshipping every member of one family as the answer to all the problems of the party and the nation, of placing a glass ceiling over all other leaders in that party, and the climate of sycophancy that such cultures lead to, are dangerous. Family fiefdoms are inconsistent with a healthy democracy.

Friday, January 19, 2007

Rahul Gandhi raped a girl in Amethi

At the outset I wish to confirm that Hindu Unity is aware of the seriousness of the charges we are levelling against Rahul Gandhi (aka Raul Maino) son of Sonia Gandhi (aka Antonia Maino). Members of Hindu Unity in Lucknow and Amethi have confirmed the news and will soon come out with necessary evidence to nail Rahul Gandhi and his friends. The following is the information that Hindu Unity has gathered. The photograph was obtained from the girl’s family and is being posted here with their permission.

On 3rd December 2006, Rahul Gandhi was camping at Amethi along with 7 others including 4 foreigners (two from Britain and other two from Italy, names not known).

Around 9 P.M all of them were drinking liquor at a V.I.P. guest house in a high security zone. They had an uninvited guest, a young girl named Sukanya Devi, 24 years of age, a staunch follower of Nehru-Gandhi family and daughter of Congress worker Balram Singh.

Sukanya was looking for an opportunity to meet Rahul Gandhi since last two years and on that fateful night she able to meet him. Sukanya's family has been supporting the Congress party since the time of Nehru.

When she met Rahul Gandhi he spoke to her for a couple of minutes and later he and his friends offered here liquor. Sukanya was amazed seeing all this, she was not feeling comfortable, she refused to have liquor and took permission to leave, but she was forced to stay back and drink. She kept resisting, but they raped her one by one. She cried for help, but her cries fell on deaf ears. Even the security personnel preferred to remain as mute spectators.

She kept weeping all along and was threatened and asked to keep her mouth shut. She was given Rs.50,000 /-. She straightaway went to the local police station. The police refused to book any complaint and asked her to go home.

Before she could reach home, Congress workers had gathered at her house and gave a different version of the incident to her father. They accused her of trying to seduce Rahul Gandhi. Her father Balram Singh, without giving her a chance to explain what had happened to her beat her up mercilessly. Balram Singh learnt the facts from others who were witness to the crime, but he preferred to remain quite as he did not want to challenge Rahul Gandhi and the Congress Party.

Sukanya's mother Sumitra Devi, who learnt about the whole incident immediately went with her daughter to Police HQ in Amethi. The Police officials refused to book any complaint and advised her to remain quite. She went from pillar to post pleading for justice, but no one heard her pleas.

Sumithra Devi gave a statement in a press conference with a very thin attendance and there she was confronted by Congressmen who physically assaulted both mother & daughter. On 27th December 2006 Sumithra Devi went to New Delhi to meet Sonia Gandhi. Sonia refused to meet her. With no options left she went to Human Rights Commission who just noted down her complaint and asked her to leave.

The Congressmen have threatened to kill both Sumithra Devi and her daughter Sukanya if she makes the rape issue public. Both the mother and daughter are in despair trying to seek justice. Both mother and daughter were camping in New Delhi for over a fortnight to get an appointment with the President of India. They have not got an appointment either with the President or with the Chief Justice.

Sukanya and her Mother had approached Human Rights Commission as well as Women Rights Commission in New Delhi in December. It is 100% Confirmed that Human Rights Officials took their complaint in a lighter vein and sent them off asking them to come back after they call for . They have asked for substantial evidence to prove their charges before going in for action. They complained that the police and local administration refused to take their complaint. Human rights was no different, they were more interested in sending them away. Surprisingly no medical examination was ordered by the Commission and no doctor or institution was willing to examine after it learnt the name of the accused.

Sukanya and her Mother had stated in their complaint to the human rights that No Doctor around Amethi or elsewhere were willing to examine her charges. The Human rights was no different.

After meeting human rights Officials both Sukanya and her mother Sumithra Devi went to Women’s Commission in New Delhi and lodged a complaint. The Woman rights also refused to come with a medical report and a police Complaint when Rahul was named as the main suspect. The women at Commission made her speak to Girija Vyas on telephone who was not available in office on that particular day. Girija Vyas who as soon as she heard their names said "I have already recieved complaint from people from Amethi and Congress Party leader Mr.Salman Khursheed that you (Sukanya and Your mother) were into flesh Trade", She alleged that Sukanya and her mother used to induce poor girls and force them into prostitution.

Girija Vyas insisted them to first meet Salman Khursheed if not she warned them with serious consequences, if false charges are made against Rahul or making this issue public. She suggested them to also meet Congress Party leader Ambika Soni if they are not comfortable meeting Salman Khursheed. Sukanya and her mother contacted Ms.Ambika Soni from the Womens Rights Office itself. She asked them to come and meet her at the earliest without even wasting anymore time. Sumithra Devi refused to go to her place saying she feared for her and her daughter's life.

Amika Soni assured them that nothing will happen to them and she will send a vehicle to pick them. Before she could say anything both ladies left the premises immediately

It is also true that both women had meet Barkha Dutt on the same day and have gone underground since then maybe because they were threatened by Congressman or may be waiting for Presidential reply. Burkha Dutt had offered them some money as compensation. This is the also the last time she meet our contact person in New Delhi and is not available since then. The President has referred the matter to Ministry of Home Affairs.

A reporter of CNN-IBN's cameraman who recoreded the statement of Sukanya and her mother has also gone missing since then. Videographer Mr.Drupadh who took an interview of Sukanya and her mother on 4th December at an unknown place on outskirts of Amethi. He had sent the cassette to his head office hoping to be an exclusive story on their channel. The Channel in turn kicked him out of the job and he has gone missing since then. Some suspect that Drupadh can be a key witness and must still be possessing one set of copy of interview . Many people have gone missing after December 4 in Amethi and no police Cases are registered.

Source said “ I am collecting the list of people who are gone missing since then. I am sure most of the missing men are witnesses to the crime of Rahul Gandhi and his Italian friends. “


Police are not interested in Booking any case against Rahul Gandhi either in Amethi or in New Delhi .

Doctors across U.P / Delhi are not willing to conduct Medical Examination on Ms.Sukhanya .

Human Rights and Women Rights groups cannot book Case until and unless Police Case or Medical Examination is conducted on the Victim.

Some more update about Sukanya and Rahul as said by our person in Lucknow

on that fateful night Sukanya tried to get the support of local bastiwalas, but no one came forward as everyone are scared of Congress Goondaism which is strong in Amethi

Sukanya father beat her so badly that she was forced to run away with her mother because Congressman wanted to kill her. A Group of 1,000 Congress people roamed the town on that night and kept warning people to keep their mouth shut otherwise they will kill them.
It allhappened under the nose ofthe police who acted helplessly.

The local media who learnt about this incidence next morning enquired from the local people. Both people and Police refused to speak anything and evaded any question. Reporters of Small and Medium Newspapers had shown interest in this incidence but it did not carry much weight. Major newspapers had heard about this incident, but did not take it seriously.

The following Reporters who were present on 4th December to cover Rahul's Trip in Amethi and who were given information about the incident. This reporters were informed about the incident, none of them took interest to look into the matter

a) IBN7
b) Dainik Jagran, Dainik Bhaskar
c) Punjab Kesari
d) Hindusthan Times (Hindi)
e) Times of India & Times now
f) NDTV (Hindi)
g) Aaj Tak
h) Star News
i) Nav bharath times

Sukanya and his mother are said to be hiding in one of their Relatives House in Harayana. Our Sources in Lucknow say that "The Congress men have been ordered to kill them at sight before they come out in open or approach the president"

Congressman have been deployed at all 7 borders of UP & Delhi to trace both motherand Daughters. Congressmen deployed at checkposts have been provided photographs of Sukanya.

Door to Door Searching is on in Amethi and neighbouring Villages to track down them, and simultaneously the villagers are being warned and threathened if they provide protection to both mother and daughter.

As per the information, both Mother and Daughter are alive (Updated information about 10:00 P.M IST 16/1/2007) and search is going on.

There is likely that Congressmen and Congress Governments in other states are secretely been instructed to track them down and hand over to them at the earliest.

We have no information like who is contacting the president on behalf of them. We are trying to gather information from our people in New Delhi whether the Human Rights has seriously registered their Complaints. Our people are hesistant to to because there is a possibility that they may apprehend us and hand over us to the police or congressmen for questioning.

Few Congress MLA'S from Uttar Pradesh are under Tremendrous pressure from the high command to Locate both mother and daughter and finish the needful.

Secretly a Reward has been announced by the Congress High Command if whosoever provides info or ......

Congressman from other districts and states are touring all over UP & Delhi.

Friday, April 07, 2006

Shaitan Gandhi aur Aiyash Nehru

At the very beginning of his book, "The Nehru Dynasty", astrologer K.N.Rao
mentions the names of Jawaharlal's father and grandfather. Jawahar Lal's father was believed to be Motilal and Motilal's father was one Gangadhar
Nehru. And we all know that Jawaharlal's only
daughter was Indira Priyadarshini Nehru; Kamala Nehru was her mother, who died in Switzerland of tuberculosis. She was totally against
Indira's proposed marriage with Feroze. (Her death is a Mystery even today)

Why? No one tells us that!

Now, who is this Feroze? We are told by many that he was the son of the family grocer. The grocer supplied wines,etc. to Anand Bhavan
(previously known as Ishrat Manzil)

What was the family grocer's name? One frequently hears that Rajiv Gandhi's grandfather was Pandit Nehru. But then we all know that everyone has two grandfathers, the paternal and the maternal
grandfathers.In fact, the paternal grandfather is deemed to be the more important grandfather in most societies.

Why is it then, no where, we find Rajiv Gandhi's paternal grandfather's name? It appears that the reason is simply this. Rajiv Gandhi's paternal grandfather was a Muslim gentleman from the Junagadh area of Gujarat.This Muslim grocer by the name of Nawab Khan, had married a Parsi woman after converting her to Islam. This is the source where from the myth of Rajiv being a Parsi was derived. Rajiv's
father Feroze, was Feroze Khan before he married Indira, against Kamala Nehru's wishes.

Feroze's mother's family name was Ghandy, often associated with Parsis and this was changed to Gandhi,sometime before his wedding with
Indira, by an affidavit*. The fact of the matter is that (and this fact can be found in many writings)

*Affidavit is available even today!!!

Indira was very lonely. Chased out of the Shantiniketan University by Guru Dev Rabindranath himself for misdemeanor, the lonely girl was all by
herself, while father Jawahar was busy with politics, pretty women and illicit sex; the mother was in
hospital. Feroze Khan, the grocer's son was then in England and he was quite sympathetic to Indira and soon enough she changed her religion,became a Muslim woman and married Feroze Khan in a London
mosque.Nehru was not happy; Kamala was dead already or dying. The news of this marriage eventually reached Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi. Gandhi
urgently called Nehru and practically ordered him to ask the young man to change his name from Khan to Gandhi. It had nothing to do with change of religion, from Islam to Hinduism for instance. It was just
a case of a change of name by an affidavit. And so Feroze Khan became Feroze Gandhi.

The surprising thing is that the apostle of truth, the old man soon to be declared India's Mahatma and the 'Father of the Nation' didn't mention this game of his in the famous book, 'My Experiments with
Truth'. Why?

When they returned to India, amock 'Vedic marriage' was instituted for public consumption. On this subject,writes M.O. Mathai (a longtime Private
Secretary of Nehru and time to time entertainer for Indira Priyadarshini Gandhi) in his renowned (but now suppressed by the GOI! ).
'Reminiscences of the Nehru Age' on page94, second
paragraph:"For some inexplicable reason, Nehru allowed the marriage to be performed according to Vedic rites in 1942. An inter-religious and
inter-caste marriage under Vedic rites at that time was not valid in law.To be legal, it had to be a civil marriage."

It's a known fact that after Rajiv's birth Indira and Feroze lived seperately, but they were not divorced. Feroze used to harass Nehru
frequently for money and also interfere in Nehru's political activities. Nehru got fed up and left instructions not to allow him into the Prime Minister's residence Trimurthi Bhavan. Mathai
writes that the death of Feroze came as a relief to Nehru and Indira. The death of Feroze in 1960 before he could consolidate his own political
forces, is itself a mystery. Feroze had even planned to remarry.

Those who try to keep tabs on our leaders in spite of all the suppressions and deliberate misinformation, are aware of the fact that the second son of Indira (or Mrs.Feroze Khan) known as Sanjay Gandhi
was not the son of Feroze. He was the son of another Muslim gentleman,Mohammad Yunus. Here, in passing, we might mention that the second son was
originally named Sanjiv. It rhymed with Rajiv, the
elder brother's name. It was changed to Sanjay when he was arrested by the British police in
England and his passport impounded, for having stolen a car. Krishna Menon was then India's High Commissioner in London. He offered to issue another passport to the felon who changed his name to Sanjay.

Incidentally, Sanjay's marriage with the Sikh girl Menaka (now they call her Maneka for Indira Gandhi found the name of Lord Indra's Court dancer rather offensive!) took place quite surprisingly in Mohammad Yunus's house in New Delhi. And the marriage with
Menaka who was a model (She had model for Bombay Dyeing wearing just a towel) was not so ordinary either.

Sanjay was notorious in getting unwed young women pregnant. Menaka too was rendered pregnant by Sanjay. It was then that her father,Colonel Anand,
threatened Sanjay with dire consequences if he did not marry her daughter.And that did the trick. Sanjay married Menaka. It was widely reported in Delhi at the time that Mohammad Yunus was unhappy at the marriage of Sanjay with Menaka. Apparently he had wanted to get him married with a Muslim girl of his choice. It was Mohammad Yunus who cried the most when Sanjay died in the plane accident.

In Yunus's book, 'Persons, Passions & Politics' one discovers that baby Sanjay had been circumcised following Islamic custom, although the reason
stated was phimosis. It was always belived that Sanjay used to blackmail Indira Gandhi and due to this she used to turn a blind eye when Sanjay Gandhi started to run the country as though it were his personal freedom. Was he black mailing her with the secret of who his real father was? When
the news of Sanjay's death reached Indira Gandhi, the first thing she wanted to know was about the bunch of keys which Sanjay had with him.

Nehru was no less a player in producing bastards. At least one case is
very graphically described by M.O. Mathai in his "Reminiscences of the NehruAge", page 206. Mathai writes: "In the autumn of 1948 a young woman
from Benares arrived in New Delhi as a sanyasini named Shraddha Mata (an assumed and not a real name). She was a Sanskrit scholar well versed in
the ancient Indian scriptures and mythology. People,
including MPs, thronged to her to hear her discourses.

One day S.D. Upadhyaya, Nehru's old employee, brought a letter in Hindi from Shraddha Mata. Nehru gave her an interview in the PM's house. As she departed, I noticed (Mathai is speaking here) that she was young,shapely and beautiful. Meetings of Nehru with her became rather frequent, mostly after he
finished his work at night. During one of Nehru's visits to Lucknow, Shraddha Mata turned up there and Upadhyaya brought a letter from her as usual. Nehru sent her the reply and she visited Nehru at
midnight..."Suddenly Shraddha Mata disappeared.

In November 1949 a convent in Bangalore sent a decent looking person to Delhi with a bundle of letters. He said that a young woman from northern
India arrived at the convent a few months ago and gave birth to a baby boy. She refused to divulge her name or give any particulars about herself. She left the convent as soon as she was well enough to move out
but left the child behind. She however forgot to take with her a small cloth bundle in which, among other things, several letters in Hindi were found. The Mother Superior, who was a foreigner, had the letters examined and was told they were from the Prime Minister. The person who brought the letters surrendered them..."I (Mathai) made discreet inquiries repeatedly about the boy but failed to get a clue about his hereabouts.Convents in such matters are extremely
tightlipped and secretive.

Had I succeeded in locating the boy, I would have adopted him. He must have grown up as a Catholic Christian blissfully ignorant of who his father was."

Coming back to Rajiv Gandhi, we all know now that he changed his so called Parsi religion to become a Catholic to marry Sania Maino of Turin, Italy.
Rajiv became Roberto. His daughter's name is Bianca and son's name is Raul. Quite cleverly the same names are presented to the people of India
as Priyanka and Rahul. What is amazing is the extent of our people's ignorance in such matters. The press conference that Rajiv Gandhi gave in London after taking over as Prime minister of India was very informative. In this press conference, Rajiv boasted that he was NOT a Hindu but a Parsi.

Mindyou, speaking of the Parsi religion, he had no Parsi ancestor at all. His grandmother (father's mother) had turned Muslim after having abandoned
the Parsi religion to marry Nawab Khan. It is the western press that waged ablitz of misinformation on behalf of Rajiv. From the New York Times to
the Los Angeles Times and the Washington Post, the big guns raised Rajiv to heaven. The children's encyclopedias recorded that Rajiv was a
qualified Mechanical Engineer from the revered
University of Cambridge. No doubt US kids are among the most misinformed in the world today! The reality is that in all three years of his tenure at that University Rajiv had not passed a single exam. He had
therefore to leave Cambridge without a certificate.

Sonia too had the same benevolent treatment. She was stated to be a student in Cambridge. Such a description is calculated to mislead Indians. She was a student in Cambridge all right, but not of the
University of Cambridge ,but of one of those fly by night language schools where foreign students come to learn English. Sonia was working as an 'au pair' (Tarannum) girl in Cambridge and trying to
learn English at the same time. And surprise of surprises, Rajiv was even cremated as per vedic rites in full view of India's public.

This is the Nehru dynasty that India worships and now an Italian leads a prestgious national party because of just one qualification being married into the Nehru family. Maneka Gandhi itself is being accepted by the
non-Congress parties not because she was a former model or an animal lover, but for her links
to the Nehru family.

Saying that an Italian should not lead India will amount to narrow mindedness, but if Sania Maino (Sonia) Had served India like say Mother Teresa, Sister Nivedita or Annie Besant, ie in anyway on her own rights, then all Indians should be proud of her just as how proud we are of Annie Besant.

Monday, March 27, 2006

IntelliBriefs: Sonia: run away lady

IntelliBriefs: Sonia: run away lady

Tuesday, February 07, 2006

IntelliBriefs: Indian Cultural Nationalism : But Where Is That Culture?

By Divya Kumar SotiThe "Theory of Cultural Nationalism" was developed by some devoted nationalists who were not ready to accept partition of their country on religious lines. It was propagated after Congress's "secularism" failed to secure "Undivided India". At that point nationalists understood that "Secularism" is a meaningless term in Indian context as people here group themselves as "Hindus" and "Muslims" firstly instead of "Indians".Congress tried to counter this superficially but Congress leaders compromised with it in name of "Real Politik". Partition of India led to rejection of Congress's "moderate nationalism". Nationalists felt the need of a cultural revolution. Need for developing a new "culture". The Culture of Nationalism. A culture where people identify themselves as "Indians" first. READ MORE
IntelliBriefs: Indian Cultural Nationalism : But Where Is That Culture?

Thursday, August 04, 2005

Hit back and Hard at the enemies- Hindu Voice

Date: 4th August 2005

Prof. G.C.ASNANI, MSc., Ph.D. (United Nations Service, Retd.)
822, Sindh Colony, Aundh, Pune - 411 007 (INDIA)
Tel: 91-20-25880347.

E-mail: i) ii)

News and Views 4th August 2005


1. Taking advantage of the gentleness of Hindu community, the aggressor enemies of Hindu Dharma, Hindu society and Hindustan have started writing pure non-sense in the Government-controlled History Text Books (NCERT Books) taught in the Indian schools. We Hindus have to hit back, and hit hard, at these enemies of ours. We have to follow our Hindu Dharma, taught in our sacred and concise Book of Srimad Bhagwat Geeta. If some body teaches our young children 2+3 = 4, we must tell the Teacher that he is wrong; we cannot tolerate teaching of such non-sense to our young growing-up children; such teaching will ruin their future careers.
We cannot be silent witnesses to such wrong teachings; such Teachers must be sent home. Similarly, the Patrons of such wrong teachings, even if they be Cabinet Ministers in the Government of India, should be sent back home to take some treatment in proper medical hospitals, if necessary.

2. Some History Books patronized by the present UPA Government of India are teaching such howlers as follows:

i) Sri Ramakrishna was illiterate and mentally unstable.
ii) Sri Rama did not exist in India.
iii) Sri Krishna was not present in the Mahabharata War.

The writers and Patrons of such howlers must be put back in the proper places,
possibly in lunatic asylums, before they damage our loved ones, the children of
our Society.

3. The purpose of Education is to help our children to show the courage, honesty and innovation that is already inside them; they should manifest the divinity which is already inside them. The Teachers and parents of the children must be encouraged to tell the young students to understand and to express, in their examination Answer Books, that such howlers are wrong. Students who show that courage should be rewarded by the Assessors of the Examination Answer Books, because they have shown understanding and courage to speak out the TRUTH.

4. We elders should not just complain, groan and sit back helplessly. We have fought and won our political Independence; our patriotic Leaders have made enormous sacrifices for this Independence. Our Great Teachers, the Heroes and Heroines described in Ramayana and Mahabharata cannot be nullified by a few fools who happen to occupy high positions in the Government hierarchy; if they are found unfit, they will be sent home. If they are found to be malicious, they will be sent home with disgrace and dis-honour.

5. We have learnt the following important lessons from our Bhagwat Geeta:

1) Sri Krishna calls Arjun : Parantapah (Scorcher of the enemies) Chapter 7, Sloka 27.
2) Sri Krishna has prescribed the following action for restoration of Righteousness, Dharma : Paritranaya Sadhunam, Vinashaya cha Duskratan (Protection of the innocent ones and annihilation of the wicked ones.) Chapter 4, Sloka 8.
3) Yatra Yogeshwara Krishno , Yatra Partho Dhanushdharah
Tatra Shree Vijayo Bhutir, Dhruva Neetir matir mamah

(Where there is combination of Yogeshwara Sri Krishna, and Dhanush
Dhari Arjuna, there verily shall be Mata Laxmi, Victory, Prosperity,
Steadfastness and correct conduct; that is my firm conclusion). Chapter 18,
Sloka 78.

Time has come for the EXIT of such honorable Historians and their Patrons who are sitting inside the Government of India, to go home before it becomes too late for them. We Hindus shall follow Gita and teach a lesson to such mischievous people.

Monday, July 18, 2005

Terrorism awarness : Thailand's King and India's "first family" a Contrast


Source : IntelliBriefs

by Dr.N S Rajaram

As always, the public is ahead of the politicians and the 'elite'. No one,especially Muslims, believes that Islam stands for peace.

I can add my recent experience, also in Thailand. On a trip to Ayyutthia a traveled with a couple of ethnic Chinese from Penang (Malaysia) and we casually fell into a conversation about problems in Southern Thailand. One of them saud:

"Everywhere, the problem is the same. Everyone knows, but the politicians don't want to mention it."

But Thailand has a big advantage. their highest leader, the King, is a symbol of nationalism and not like the "first family" in India, which is a rootless upstart clan which is there only to loot the country.